Clean Agile Language

Comment

Clean Agile Language

With an homage to clean language, I was inspired in a Moose Herd session the other day as we explored the damage that agile terminology can do when we’re coaching.

So, the thought that jumped in my mind was the notion of an Agile Coach coaching using Clean Agile Language.

I know what you’re thinking…what is that?

Well, we coach without using any agile terminology. Zero, zilch, nada, none! Inclusive of—

No Scrum terminology

For example—no talk of roles/accountabilities, no events, or sprints.

No XP terminology

For example, no talk about user stories, acceptance criteria, or CI/CD.

No Kanban terminology

For example—no talk of WIP, flow, or SLA’s.

No SAFe terminology

For example—no talk of value streams or trains, SAFe Scrum Masters or other roles, and no talk LACE.

No Agile book or guidance references

For example, stop referencing Agile 2, LeSS, Scrum Guide, Agile Manifesto, or Scrum: The Art of Doing Twice the Work in Half the Time.

You can’t say anything with “agile” or “Agile” in it. And don’t get me started about Agile Coaching terminology—powerful questions, reveal the system, stances, competencies, and wheels, oh my!

Bob, are there any exceptions?

I think I might make an exception for lean language or business agility language, but be super careful with it. And begrudgingly, I must allow an exception for any trainer teaching one of the above methods, frameworks, or approaches.

My Challenge to Myself and other Agile Coaches

First, let me acknowledge that I’m not good at this now. If judged harshly, one might say I suck at it. Given that, I understand how challenging making this shift might be, so I’m going to start with some small experiments—

  1. Can I go for a day of interactions applying clean agile language?

  2. Can I deliver one of my existing presentations applying clean agile language?

  3. Can I have a coaching client conversation, just one, by applying clean agile language?

Then reflect on how that felt for me and its impact on whoever I was talking to.

Wish me luck, everyone. I think I’m in for a bumpy ride…

Stay agile my friends,

Bob.

Comment

Do you need an Agile Coaching Playbook?

Comment

Do you need an Agile Coaching Playbook?

I happened upon the Boston Consulting Group paper entitled Why Your Agile Coaching Isn’t Working—And How to Fix It

Here’s a short snippet from the article that I want to use as a backdrop for several points—

The coaching playbook is especially useful when coaches run two-week “sprint” interventions with teams that need to improve a specific capability or to address performance gaps. The coach then chooses from hundreds of “battle-tested” interventions in the playbook that target that capability or performance gap, and designs a sprint plan based on it. At the end of the sprint, the coach and team evaluate the impact of the intervention. Reflecting on the effectiveness of the intervention and creating new ones also helps propagate and improve the catalog of interventions.

Comment

Value Stream or Organizational Structure?

Comment

Value Stream or Organizational Structure?

The chicken or the egg

It’s a bit of a chicken and egg problem. Which comes first when transitioning to agile ways of working? Do you re-organize or restructure your organization first – setting teams and roles up for more agile execution? Or do you align your product, application, and workflows into value streams to feed to your teams? What a conundrum.

Ten years ago, I saw most organizations leaning into organizational changes and not putting much thought into the value streams their teams would be working on.

Now it’s flipped a bit, and there’s a strong focus on value streams, probably influenced by SAFe, amongst many factors. And then, the executing organization is composed as an afterthought.

Comment

Valued People Create Value

Comment

Valued People Create Value

I saw this exchange on LinkedIn between David Pereira and Michael Küsters.  

Here’s a snippet of what David said—

❌ Customers don’t care which agile framework you use
❌ Customers don’t mind how you work
❌ Customers couldn’t care less about your state of the art product delivery

✅ Customers only care about how you make their lives better—no more, no less

Are we sometimes or maybe too often missing the mark?

And Michael commented—

❌ Customers don’t care if you burn out your employees
❌ Customers don’t care if you don't listen to your employees
❌ Customers don’t care if you underpay your employees
❌ Customers don’t care if you fire your employees to keep more profit for yourself

The customer isn't everything. That's a dysfunction already.

✅ Customers will care if you treat people like people, with dignity and respect - because the service they'll get from such people is going to be different than the service provided by drones.

Later on in the comment trail, someone mentioned that you can do both—

Care about value creation and how you treat your people.

And I agree. But that statement puts the two on equal footing. However, that part I disagree with and want to prioritize one over the other.

I believe people should come first and how you treat your people drives the value that you create for your customers.

I realized that’s not what David was saying. But I wanted to lean into Michael’s perspective and amplify it a wee bit more.

Stay agile my friends,

Bob.

BTW: it’s worthwhile to read David’s entire post AND all of the comments.

 

Comment

You’ve got a seat at the table…now what?

1 Comment

You’ve got a seat at the table…now what?

There has been a drumbeat for many years that we need more diversity in the ranks of corporate leadership—particularly women. It’s been increasing in tempo, loudness, and duration, but we still struggle. In this 2021 McKinsey report, women make up only 24% of C-suite roles, and women of color, only 4%--while we’re making progress, indeed, there is much work! 

1 Comment

10 Bitter Pills for Agile Leaders

1 Comment

10 Bitter Pills for Agile Leaders

10 Bitter Pills to Swallow About Agile for Leaders


1. Customers don't care if you're agile, waterfall or otherwise.
They care about their experience & that your product helps them. Focus on the quality and frequency of your interactions with customers.

2. It won't solve all of your problems.
Agile isn't a panacea. It'll just expose your problems quicker. The core of Agility is that it builds in feedback loops. It's up to you to learn from them and adjust from there.

3. Telling people, they have psychological safety isn't enough.
You need to demonstrate that people are ok to fail through action, not just words. Celebrate failure, be intentional about creating a safe environment.

1 Comment

Leadership and Power

Comment

Leadership and Power

I saw this point on LinkedIn from Leise Passer Jensen and it resonated with me… powerfully.—

No-one could have warned me about this prior to my first leadership job:

𝙄𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙝𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙢𝙖𝙮 𝙡𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙞𝙩 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙛.

This is scary: 
Contemporary research now shows that…  
… everyone is predisposed to abusing power. So that includes you and me.
The most dangerous threat for leaders is …power.  
Power corrupts and may change your brain.
Its consequential behavior can harm ourselves and others.
Few people were told this before they accept an appointed leadership role. That can be dangerous for us as leaders as well as for those who are subjected to our leadership.

Power changes the brain! 

Comment

SAFe -- The Gift that Keeps on Giving & Growing

3 Comments

SAFe -- The Gift that Keeps on Giving & Growing

I just saw the announcement for SAFe 6.0. WoooHooo! 

Just when I needed it, Scaled Agile anticipated my needs and delivered another, even more chock full of value scaling toolbox.

It inspired me to try and visualize how it’s become increasingly more helpful over time. So, here goes…

3 Comments

Call the Agile Tow Truck

1 Comment

Call the Agile Tow Truck

Anthony Mersino is a good friend and colleague of mine, and he asked the following question:

What are the disadvantages of using agile and Scrum? 

And it made me think a bit. Not only about the question but what would be the best way to answer it.

At the risk of offending some, I kept thinking of a car. Putting the pollution aspect to the side for a second, cars are inherently good. They’ve provided transportation to humans for well over a century. They’ve also evolved, becoming safer, more efficient, and more intelligent. They’re even beginning to self-drive, which is an exciting development.

But then I think the primary disadvantages (or problems) are not in the cars themselves, but in the users—us. It’s how we use them that’s the more significant challenge. For example, driving recklessly or under the influence. Not maintaining them safely. Or allowing unlicensed/inexperienced individuals to drive them too soon.

1 Comment

Value = Retention Equivalency under Pressure

Comment

Value = Retention Equivalency under Pressure

We discussed the latest round of agile role layoffs at Capital One the other day in the Moose Herd. The news was that Capital One had laid off 1100 people, all with agile in the titles/job families. The public reason shared was that they’d sufficiently evolved their agile capabilities to a point where it made no sense to have independent roles. That (everyone) was now agile.

Of course, there was quite a passionate discussion about—

  • What are the fundamental driving forces behind the move?

  • Was this a perceived success / evolutionary step or a failure?

  • Since Capital One was such a bellwether, was this the beginning of a trend in the agile community?

  • What might happen to all of those people?

I was pretty struck by the turbulence that this one event created in our community, as the Herd reflected.

One of the things we got heated about was the intentions of the organizational leaders, particularly exploring whether they valued agile or not. And whether they valued people or not.

Comment